balancing traditional and modern norms

The region has become the subject of a heated debate over” Asian values” as a result of Asian countries ‘ economic successes, which are frequently achieved using quite different methods than those of the West. The alleged unity of Eastern economic models, political ideals and cultural practices, and the responsibility of social factors in East Asia’s introduction as an foreign power sexy filipina girls have been the main topics of discussion in this debate.

An incensed belligerence by East Asians has always been a consistent response to these accusations. The characterizations of their societies that have emerged in the process are certainly flattering: they are said to be self- reliant, yet apparently communitarian, centered on personal relationships and shared obligation rather than cold letter of the law – even though the latter is called upon to enforce those values, respectful of hierarchy and authority, and state interventionist, oftentimes into the private space of individuals.

This defensiveness is a natural reaction to the fact that the affected societies are experiencing an unprecedented level of change as a result of globalization forces. The heart of this discussion is, however, the way in which these societies are attempting to create norms of governance and social organization that will be viewed as legitimate by their citizens.

This is being done at the local level, in public forums, in local government, and in their respective social and religious institutions. In my informal poll of respondents in 1994 and 1996, I think it’s because the majority of Asians place an emphasis on maintaining an organized society even at the expense of some individual freedoms.